There are a number of 19th century classroom practices that we've tried hard to eliminate during the 20th century. These include whole-class teaching from the front of the room, seeing learning as the transfer of information from the knowledgeable teacher to the ignorant students, and seeing knowledge as discrete - as facts to be learned. I'd suggest that interactive whiteboards encourage teachers to revert to these 19th century practices and that their use runs counter to the direction set in the new New Zealand Curriculum, which emphasises self management and personalised or co-constructed learning.
We forget that technology massages us into behaving in certain ways: the car, the telephone, the electric plug, television, the Internet, have all dramatically changed the way we behave. The interactive whiteboard encourages us to teach in particular ways and these may not actually be a good thing. We need to think through how this technology changes our behaviour and the messages about learning interactive whiteboards encourage.
And I'm always suspicious of "products" that teachers need to be better teachers. To be better, teachers seldom need products - they don't need a Smartboard, they just need to be smart.
amen!!
ReplyDeleteWhat about the 'smart' teacher who knows how to 'use' a smartboard properly? While I agree with the comments above (although slightly cynical), I recall a famous movie quote, "With great power comes great responsibility". You conclusion does not sways your suggestion into subjectivity.
ReplyDeleteYeah, that's a bit like the gun lobby saying it's not guns that shoot people it's people who do the shooting. The trouble is more guns = more shooting. I'd suggest that the more interactive whiteboards; the more crappy teaching.
ReplyDelete